top of page

The Servant of Two Masters

The Adaptation

Although The Servant of Two Masters (1746, reworked by author in 1753) is often viewed as the representative masterwork of the Commedia genre, it is instructive to remember that it was written over 100 years after the height of the common street theatre that serves as its inspiration, and differs from "classical" Commedia in several ways--most notably due to the presence of a script! Nevertheless, the work is overflowing with stock characters, lazzi, and other trademarks of the Commedia genre, and its easy-to-follow plot and physical comedy have undoubtedly helped its reputation as an accessible and fun work of theatre for contemporary audiences.

THE CHARACTERS

The characters of One Man, Two Guvnors are based on the characters from Goldoni's play, who are themselves adaptations of the original Commedia archetypes. Click on the pictures below to find a rough guide to the archetypal origins of your character!
 

CLICK ON THE CHARACTERS BELOW for more info on each, and
BE SURE TO VISIT THE "STYLE" PAGE FOR MUCH MORE INFO ABOUT COMMEDIA!

Character List

VECCHI: ("Old Men" / "Masters")

Archetype: Pantalone
Goldoni: Pantalone
Bean: "Charlie the Duck"

Archetype: Il Dottore
Goldoni: Dr. Lombardi
Bean: Harry Dangle

ZANNI: (Servants)

Archetype: Arlecchino
Goldoni: Truffaldino
Bean: Francis

Archetype: Brighella
Goldoni: Brighella
Bean: Lloyd Boateng

Archetype: Columbina
Goldoni: Smeraldina
Bean: Dolly

Archetype: Isabella
Goldoni: Clarice
Bean: Pauline

INNAMORATI: (the lovers)

Archetype: Vittoria
Goldoni: Beatrice*
Bean: Rachel

Archetype: Silvio
Goldoni: Silvio
Bean: Alan

Archetype: Lelio
Goldoni: Florindo*
Bean: Stanley Stubbers

* Dramaturg's note: not all scholars agree that Goldoni based Beatrice and Florindo on stock characters, claiming these are the only two fully "original" characters in the script. A large part of their argument is that the characters are truly in love, whereas Commedia innamorati are often described as being more "in love with being in love" than actually in love themselves. Although I cannot provide irrefutable proof, my professional, dramaturgical reaction to these scholars is to roll my eyes and call them Poopy McPoopface. The ties to these two archetypes are, to my mind, beyond obvious, and the cynical ploys of "in love with love" seem little more inspired than claiming Shakespeare couldn't possibly have written his oeuvre without the benefit of a University education. Not that any of this REALLY affects you, but in case you're doing some research and find someone claiming the opposite, those are my thoughts on the matter.   :) 

CARLO GOLDONI

Carlo Osvaldo Goldoni (1707-1793) 

Although the genre now known as Commedia dell'Arte had been a pillar of artistic pride for over 200 years in Italy (and, indeed, largely known in Italy and throughout Europe as simply "Italian Comedy"), by the mid- and late-18th century it had largely seemed to run its course. The rules and intellectualism of the neoclassicists had long since achieved a foothold, Shakespeare's treatments of Italian Comedy had come and gone, and Moliere's modern character- and societal-driven farces were all the range out of France. 

 

Previously cherished for its basis in improvisation, instantly recognizable stock characters, and broad "slapstick" physical comedy, it seems Commedia's charm as a street theatre was becoming passe, and masterful writers were now preferred to ensembles with improvised wit and physical genius.

Enter Carlo Goldoni. An avid Moliere fan and, as he makes clear throughout his memoirs, a devoted Italian, Goldoni seems to have been very concerned with creating a new "Italian Theatre." This new national style would take into account the Three Unities and other aspects that would later come to be known as ingredients for the "well-made play," while simultaneously providing the civic humor and character-driven comedy of his beloved Moliere. A great many of his plays feature aspects that many would recognize from Commedia traditions, while still breaking from these conventions and exploring modern techniques and themes. Most notably among his changes to Commedia were his decisions to have his actors go maskless (perhaps representing an interest in a more realistic portrayal of the admittedly still "stock" character, rather than embracing the anonymity of "type") and replacing the skeleton scenario plot sketch/improv with a fully fleshed-out script.  While some claim these changes reformed and saved Commedia and others claim they destroyed the artform, it is hard to deny these changes led to one of the most famous works of the genre.

In The Servant of Two Masters, Goldoni provides the basic framework of innamorati kept apart by the meddling of the Vecchi and the dim-witted Zanni who both complicates and unwittingly helps solve the dilemma of the scenario. He carries over adapted versions of traditional Commedia characters (see "The Characters" listed previously on this page), and--although tightly scripted--provides space for actors to enact various Lazzi as part of the performance (see "Style--Commedia"). The play is quintessentially Commedia in its humor and heart, while creating a modern (for its time) and somewhat more "realistic" variant (though still well shy of the Naturalism and Realism that would come a century later). For more info on Goldoni and his works, consider visiting here, here, and here

MAJOR PLOT DIFFERENCES

Considering the few centuries between Goldoni and Bean, there's actually surprisingly few changes to the basic plot framework despite the extensive changes to location, language, etc.

 

Of particular note is Bean's handling of the arranged marriage plot device. Obviously, an arranged marriage would have seemed a particular oddity in mid-20th-century Britain, but Bean's use of a "lavender marriage" fits the bill - i.e., a marriage of convenience in which a homosexual individual marries a person of the opposite gender (sometimes, though not always, homosexual themselves) for the purpose of "faking" heterosexuality for public reputation. These became especially popular in the early and mid 20th century, as pop culture "stars" and their fandoms became a more ubiquitous aspect of daily life, and yet public opinions of homosexuality could mean the end to a career. If you're unfamiliar with the history of lavender marriages in the entertainment industry (esp in the early 20th century), check out this admittedly-not-very-scholarly-but-certainly-full-of-zip article might help.

 

Beyond that, Commedia often included some music through the personal talents of its performers, but I can't think of an example (of traditional street Commedia or of Servant...) when a house band was incorporated! Also, the audience participation scenes are both traditional, in that they bring some of the foundational improvisation back to the production, and non-traditional, in that, while audiences were always fair game to riff off of, they weren't usually brought up on stage! 

 

bottom of page